HL7 & FHIR Integration Services

Interoperability That Actually Works
Custom HL7 v2 and FHIR integration — interface development, HL7-to-FHIR transformation, interface-engine implementation, and EHR, lab and imaging connectivity. HIPAA-compliant, for hospitals, EHR vendors, labs and digital-health companies.
Reliable partner
Reliable partner
Experienced team
Experienced team
Smart solutions
Smart solutions
Healthcare HL7 Development 1920
Healthcare HL7 Development 1440

Industry Leaders We Work With

Related Healthcare Services

Explore the Wider Healthcare Practice

HL7 integration connects the systems around it, so these related healthcare services cover the records, devices, and analytics your data flows into.

“Only 27% of routinely interoperable hospitals sent electronic summary-of-care records to external post-acute providers.” — HIMSS

Most healthcare data still stops at the organization's edge, so we build the interfaces that move it, because interoperability in healthcare fails at the seams, not in the standards.
The Basics

What HL7 Is and How FHIR Fits

HL7, or Health Level Seven, is the most widely used standard for exchanging healthcare data. HL7 was established in 1987 and is maintained by Health Level Seven International.
HL7 v2 messaging

HL7 v2 messaging

An HL7 message carries clinical and administrative data between systems. HL7 version 2 remains the backbone of hospital interfaces, and HL7 v2.x message types still move most clinical traffic.
HL7 v3 and CDA

HL7 v3 and CDA

HL7 v3 and CDA or CCDA documents structure healthcare records for exchange, sitting alongside messaging rather than replacing it.
FHIR

FHIR

The FHIR standard is the modern, API-based approach from HL7 International. FHIR resources and FHIR APIs let healthcare apps read and write data over the web.
Zoolatech quickly delivers senior engineers through rigorous multi-stage screening and global sourcing, ensuring only high-performing, project-ready talent joins your team.

1 month

To fill a position

60%

Senior developers

1M

Global talent pool
What We Provide

HL7 Integration and Implementation Services

Every hospital runs a different mix of systems, so packaged connectors rarely fit. Our HL7 FHIR integration services cover interface development, transformation, and the healthcare software around it.
98%

98%

Client Retention Rate
300+

300+

Successful Projects

HL7 interface development

Build and maintain the HL7 interface set that connects your systems, from a single feed to a full estate.

FHIR API development

Expose FHIR APIs and build a FHIR server or facade, with SMART on FHIR authorization where apps need it.

HL7-to-FHIR transformation

Map HL7 and CCDA to FHIR resources so modern healthcare applications can consume legacy data.

Interface engine work

Implement or extend Mirth Connect, Rhapsody, or Cloverleaf, or build custom where an engine falls short.

EHR and EMR integration

Connect Epic, Oracle Health, and other electronic health record systems through supported standards.

Lab and imaging

Integrate LIS, RIS, and PACS so orders and results flow without manual entry.

Medical data integration

Deliver HL7 data integration and middleware across clinical, financial, and operational systems.

Support and monitoring

Monitor interfaces in production, because integration allows nothing to break silently.

AI-assisted integration

Use AI to accelerate mapping, validation, and documentation across large interface estates.

Managed delivery

Run the program through managed delivery, team extension, or a dedicated team.

Standards and Messages

HL7 Standards and Message Types

Knowing which HL7 standard applies where is what keeps an integration simple, so we work across the whole family.
HL7 v2 messages
Transport and security
Documents
FHIR

The working standard

HL7 version 2 messages carry most clinical traffic, and each message type serves a purpose.
  • Message types: ADT for admissions and transfers, ORM for orders, ORU for results, SIU for scheduling, MDM for documents.
  • Segments: each HL7 message is built from segments and fields, which is where mapping accuracy is won or lost.

How messages travel

HL7 v2 moves over MLLP, and protecting it in transit is part of HL7 compliance.
  • MLLP over TLS: messages are encrypted in transit so electronic health information stays protected.
  • Reliability: acknowledgements, retries, and queuing keep healthcare data exchange from dropping messages.

v3, CDA, and CCDA

HL7 v3 and CDA structure documents rather than messages, and both still appear across US healthcare.
  • CCDA: summary documents exchanged between organizations and used for regulatory reporting.
  • Conversion: CDA and CCDA are common inputs when you integrate HL7 data into a FHIR store.

The modern API

The FHIR specification defines resources and a REST API, which is why new digital health products start here.
  • Resources: FHIR resources model patients, encounters, observations, and more as addressable objects.
  • REST and OAuth: FHIR APIs use HTTPS with OAuth 2.0, and SMART on FHIR for app authorization.
Image abstract 1 368
Testimonials

What Our Customers Say

“In the case of Zoolatech, it's a very tight partnership.
The team at Zoolatech is incredibly collaborative, and we work as a team despite being thousands of miles away from each other.”
Spencer Rascoff
CEO Match Group
5/5
“Zoolatech has been a key technology partner for Pandora,
enhancing our software development and deployment capabilities. They're ambitious, supportive, fast-moving, and well-skilled, with sound ethical values.”
Erika Romsics
Contract and Vendor Manager, Pandora
erica
5/5
“The apps they’ve developed give us the opportunity to get more customers.
We’re providing more services to target big customers. We can install jobs faster and identify reduce bottlenecks, so we’re providing a better customer experience.”
Aida Youssef
Senior Director of Software Engineering, Complete Solaria
5/5
“Zoolatech has access to a deep talent pool and knows how to identify client's needs.
With the help of Zoolatech, went from a very early and incomplete prototype to the MVP release, the first production release, and the first paying customer!”
Greg Wagenhoffer
CEO, GreenVisr
5/5
“Zoolatech enabled us to build a world-class engineering team quickly and efficiently.
Zoolatech's pre-screening process and engineer training are customized for providing effective engineers that can contribute immediately to accelerating product roadmaps.”
Shariq Minhas
CTO, SVSG
5/5
“We can recommend Zoolatech
for their talent pool, attention, ability to understand our requirements, candidate screening process and constant communication.”
Chaitanya Pallapothula
SVP, Tailored Brands, Inc.
5/5
“Zoolatech’s developers quickly became an integral part of our team effort
with whom we shared daily stand up calls. Overall, Zoolatech fit well with our needs for agile development and continued to adapt as our needs evolved.”
Forrest Glick
UX Designer, Stanford University
5/5
“Working with Zoolatech has been a driving force in our business offerings.
The team utilizes it's experience and expertise meshing with our internal team creating a positive work environment. Zoolatech is by far one of the best teams to work with in the industry.”
Kris Naidu
CEO, Zeacon
Kris Naidu CEO, Zeacon
5/5
Migration

Moving From HL7 v2 to FHIR

FHIR is where healthcare is heading, but HL7 v2 runs today's hospital, so migration is a transformation layer rather than a switch.
01

Mapping

We map HL7 v2 messages, and CDA or CCDA documents, to the equivalent FHIR resources, then validate that no clinical meaning is lost.
02

Transformation layer

Messages are parsed and converted in flight, so a FHIR API can serve modern apps while legacy interfaces keep running untouched.
03

Coexistence

Most organizations run both for years. We design for coexistence so v2 and FHIR stay consistent rather than drifting apart.
04

AI-assisted mapping

Large estates involve thousands of fields, so we use AI to draft and check mappings, with engineers reviewing every result.
Build or Buy

Interface Engine or Custom Integration

The honest answer depends on how standard your interfaces are and how much transformation you need.
Use an interface engine

Use an interface engine

Mirth Connect, Rhapsody, Cloverleaf, and Iguana manage many standard interfaces centrally.
  • Fast for standard feeds
  • Central monitoring
  • Familiar to healthcare IT
  • Licensing and engine limits
Build custom

Build custom

Custom integration or a pipeline on top of an engine handles what the engine cannot.
  • Complex transformation
  • FHIR APIs and cloud scale
  • No feature ceiling
  • You own the logic

“71% of hospitals routinely had outside clinical information available, but only 42% said clinicians often used it.” — National Library of Medicine

Delivering a message is not the same as delivering usable data, so we map and normalize to the receiving system's workflow, because data no one can act on is data no one trusts.
Regulation

Interoperability Rules and Compliance

Data exchange is now a legal obligation as much as a technical one, so we build the frameworks that govern it.
TEFCA and QHINs
USCDI
CMS and Cures
HIPAA and security

Nationwide exchange

TEFCA and its QHINs create a common path for nationwide exchange, which changes how health systems connect to each other.
  • Participation: connecting through a QHIN so you can exchange health records beyond your own network.
  • Architecture: integrations designed so joining a network does not mean rebuilding every interface.
  • Onboarding: mapping your existing feeds to the framework’s requirements before you go live on the network.
Image slot

What must be shared

USCDI defines the data classes and elements that must be available, setting the floor for health data interoperability.
  • Coverage: mapping your data to USCDI classes so required elements are actually present and populated.
  • Validation: checking that exchanged data meets the specified level of data completeness.
  • Versioning: tracking USCDI updates so your interfaces stay current as new data classes are added.
Image slot

The mandates

CMS interoperability rules and the 21st Century Cures information-blocking rule require organizations to share electronic health information.
  • Patient access: FHIR APIs that let patients and approved apps retrieve their records.
  • Prior authorization: API-based workflows that meet the CMS prior-authorization requirements.
  • Information blocking: exchange designed to avoid the practices the Cures Act prohibits.
Image slot

Protecting the data

Every interface carries protected health information, so security is designed in rather than added afterward.
  • In transit: MLLP over TLS for messaging and HTTPS with OAuth 2.0 for FHIR.
  • Access and audit: role-based access and audit logging across every integration point.
  • At rest: protected health information encrypted in storage, not only while it moves between systems.
Image slot
Pipelines and AI

Modern Pipelines, Cloud, and AI

Integration is a data problem at scale, which is where our data engineering and AI work applies.
HL7 to FHIR pipelines

Move data continuously

  • Streaming ingestion of HL7 feeds with tools like Kafka
  • Transformation into FHIR resources in flight
  • Hundreds of pipelines managed as one estate
  • Batch and real-time paths side by side
Managed cloud FHIR

Store it in the cloud

  • AWS HealthLake as a managed FHIR store
  • Azure Health Data Services for device and FHIR data
  • Scale without running the plumbing yourself
  • Cost and performance tuned to your volumes
AI on clinical data

Where AI earns its place

  • AI-assisted mapping across large interface estates
  • AI extraction of structure from unstructured notes and documents
  • AI validation that flags malformed or suspicious messages
  • Governed AI, documented and monitored, with clinicians in the loop
Observability

See every message

  • Monitoring and alerting on interface health
  • Dashboards for throughput, latency, and errors
  • Message-level tracing for fast diagnosis
  • Data quality checks before anything reaches analytics
Analytics handoff

Turn feeds into insight

  • Normalized clinical data delivered to the warehouse
  • Integration with our healthcare data analytics practice
  • Reporting on data integration across systems
  • AI and ML models trained on consistent, governed data
Where It Applies

Common Integration Use Cases

The same standards solve a familiar set of problems, and each use case has its own quirks.

Orders and results

EHR to LIS integration sends orders and returns results, the highest-volume feed in most hospitals and the one clinicians notice first when it breaks.

Imaging and documents

EHR to RIS and PACS connects imaging orders, reports, and studies, so radiology findings reach the chart without a manual step.

ADT, billing, and devices

ADT feeds keep every downstream system current, billing integration turns clinical events into claims, and device and RPM data flows in through the same standards.
Who We Build For

Built for Everyone Connecting Clinical Systems

Hospitals, vendors, and diagnostics teams all hit the same wall, and healthcare providers need integration that fits their estate.
Hospitals and health systems

Hospitals and health systems

Health systems connect their EHR, hospital information system, and departmental software, and modernize aging interfaces without disrupting care.
EHR and healthtech vendors

EHR and healthtech vendors

Vendors building healthcare apps get the FHIR APIs and interface work their customers demand, so integration stops blocking deals.
Labs, imaging, and payers

Labs, imaging, and payers

Labs, diagnostics, imaging centers, and payers exchange orders, results, and claims data reliably across organizational lines.
How We Work

From System Map to Live Interfaces

You get working interfaces that reach production in a controlled sequence, so each connection is tested and proven before the next one goes live.
Step 1

Discovery

We map your systems, message types, standards, and any interface engine already in place. This is where integration challenges surface early, so scope reflects the real estate rather than an assumption.
Step 2

Interface design

We design each interface and the transformation it needs, deciding where an engine fits and where custom code is the better answer. Good design here is what keeps the estate maintainable later.
Step 3

Build and map

We build the interfaces and the mappings, including HL7-to-FHIR transformation where it applies, with AI assisting on large field sets and engineers reviewing every mapping.
Step 4

Test and validate

We test with real message samples, validate against the standard, and check security end to end. Integration testing catches the edge cases that would otherwise surface in production.
Step 5

Deploy

We cut over carefully, running old and new in parallel where risk demands it, so clinical operations never wait on an interface.
Step 6

Monitor and extend

We monitor interfaces in production and add new ones as your estate grows, because implementing HL7 is an ongoing program rather than a one-time project.
Technology Stack

The Integration Stack

The right stack decides how cleanly interfaces run and how far the estate scales.
Mirth Connect
Mirth Connect
HL7
HL7
FHIR
FHIR
Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka
AWS HealthLake
AWS HealthLake
Azure Health Data Services
Azure Health Data Services
Java
Java
Python
Python
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Grafana
Grafana
Databricks
Databricks
and other
Cost Factors

What Drives Cost and Timeline

Cost tracks the number of interfaces and the depth of transformation, so it helps to know what moves the number.

Interfaces and systems

A single interface between two systems is a small project. Connecting many healthcare information systems across departments is a program.

Standards involved

HL7 v2 only, FHIR only, or both changes the work. Supporting both, plus CDA documents, adds mapping and testing.

Engine or custom

Implementing an interface engine differs from building custom integration, and licensing shifts cost from build to run.

Migration and cloud

HL7-to-FHIR migration, cloud FHIR stores, and pipeline work each add scope. A precise estimate follows a discovery phase that maps your systems and message types.
Our Edge

Integration Engineering, Not Just Connectors

What sets our HL7 integration work apart is depth in both the standards and the data engineering underneath them.
check icon

HL7 and FHIR together

We work across HL7 v2, v3, CDA, and FHIR, so we recommend the standard that fits the job rather than the one we prefer.
check icon

Migration expertise

HL7-to-FHIR transformation is engineering, not configuration, and we build the mapping and validation that keeps clinical meaning intact.
check icon

Engine-neutral

We implement Mirth Connect and other engines, and we build custom where engines fall short, so the recommendation is not a sales position.
check icon

Data engineering depth

Real streaming and big-data experience means interface estates that scale, with observability so no message disappears quietly.
check icon

AI where it helps

We apply AI to mapping, validation, and document extraction, governed and reviewed, so AI speeds the work without risking accuracy.
check icon

Compliance built in

TEFCA, USCDI, CMS rules, and HIPAA shape the design from the start, so compliance is not a retrofit.
check icon

Senior-heavy delivery

A senior team that has delivered 300+ projects since 2017, with 600+ engineers and 96% client satisfaction, does the work.
check icon

Near and offshore

A Miami HQ with delivery centers in Poland, Ukraine, Mexico, and Turkey gives you scale through managed delivery, team extension, or an ODC.
Why Choose Us

Why Businesses Trust Us

logo
At Zoolatech, we create engineering teams for industry leaders across the US and Europe — teams that move fast, think big, and deliver strong impact.
96%
Client Satisfaction
300+
Successful Projects
2017
Year Founded
98%
Retention Rate
team sport photo
At Zoolatech, we create engineering teams for industry leaders across the US and Europe — teams that move fast, think big, and deliver strong impact.
Engineering Excellence. Every Time.
main award png (1)
At Zoolatech, we create engineering teams for industry leaders across the US and Europe — teams that move fast, think big, and deliver strong impact.
team sport photo
600+
Employees
Headquarters
USA
Development Centers
PL
UA
MX
TR

Need HL7 or FHIR Integration

Tell us your systems, the standards involved, and whether you run an interface engine, and we scope an approach.
Questions You May Have

What is HL7?

Health Level 7 is a family of standards for exchanging clinical and administrative data between healthcare systems, maintained by Health Level Seven International. According to HL7, the standards cover v2 messaging, v3 and CDA documents, and FHIR.

What are the benefits of HL7 integration?

The benefits of HL7 are fewer manual steps, faster results, and consistent healthcare records across systems. HL7 provides a shared data exchange standard, so different healthcare information systems exchange data without custom one-off formats.

What is the difference between HL7 v2 and FHIR?

HL7 v2 is a mature messaging standard that still runs most hospital interfaces, while the FHIR standard uses web APIs and reusable resources. Most organizations use the HL7 v2 estate internally and expose FHIR APIs externally.

What is an HL7 interface engine, and do I need Mirth or custom integration?

An engine receives, transforms, routes, and sends messages, and options include Mirth Connect, Rhapsody, Cloverleaf, and Iguana. An engine suits many standard feeds, while custom integration handles complex transformation, FHIR APIs, and cloud scale.

How do you migrate from HL7 v2 to FHIR?

Migration maps HL7 v2 messages, and often CDA or CCDA, to FHIR resources, then validates that nothing is lost. It runs as a transformation layer, so you adopt FHIR for new healthcare apps while legacy interfaces keep running.

What is interoperability in healthcare?

Data interoperability is the ability of different systems to exchange and correctly use data, defined by standards such as HL7, FHIR, and USCDI. Frameworks like TEFCA, plus CMS rules and the Cures Act, require exchanging electronic health information.

How does HL7 integration work?

A sending system emits an HL7 message that travels over MLLP, usually secured with TLS, to an engine or integration service, where it is validated, transformed, and delivered. FHIR-based integration works similarly but uses REST APIs and resources.

What are common HL7 integration challenges?

Vendor-specific message variations, inconsistent data formats, and undocumented legacy interfaces cause most delays. Good HL7 integration strategies start with a system map and validation, so problems surface in testing rather than in production.

Can AI help with HL7 and FHIR integration?

Yes. AI accelerates mapping across large field sets, extracts structure from unstructured documents, and flags malformed messages for review. AI assists engineers rather than replacing review, because clinical data accuracy is not negotiable.

How much does HL7 or FHIR integration cost?

Cost depends on the number of interfaces and systems, whether you use HL7 v2, FHIR, or both, whether you build custom or implement an engine, and whether you migrate to FHIR. A precise estimate follows discovery.

Is HL7 integration HIPAA compliant and secure?

It has to be, because interfaces carry protected health information. HL7 v2 travels over MLLP secured with TLS, FHIR APIs use HTTPS with OAuth 2.0 and SMART on FHIR, and access is role-based and audit-logged.

Do you provide HL7 integration services in the USA?

Yes. We serve US healthcare organizations from our Miami headquarters, with delivery centers in Poland, Ukraine, Mexico, and Turkey. Engagements run as managed delivery, team extension, or a dedicated team.