Cross-industry engineering experience across regulated and high-growth sectors.
All Industries
“By 2027, 80% of large organizations will embrace platform engineering to scale DevOps initiatives.” — Gartner
“Elite performers deploy 182 times more frequently than low performers and recover 2,293 times faster.” — Google Cloud
USA
PL
UA
MX
TRA DevOps consultant assesses how code reaches production, identifies where it stalls or breaks, and sequences the fixes by risk. In practice that means auditing pipelines, provisioning, environment parity, alerting, and on-call structure, then producing a maturity read and a prioritized roadmap tied to specific failure points rather than a generic framework.
DevOps work is about how changes move to production, SRE work is about how the system behaves under load and failure, and platform engineering packages both so developers ship without filing tickets. The three share tooling and differ in what each is accountable for: throughput, reliability, and developer self-service respectively.
It starts with an assessment rather than a proposal, mapping the current pipeline, provisioning, environment parity, monitoring coverage, and incident process against a target state. The output is a maturity read plus a list of fixes ordered by risk and cost of downtime, so the first sprint addresses the failure that costs the most rather than the one easiest to demo.
Ask for evidence on four points: pipelines they have fixed under production traffic with before-and-after numbers, whether they run what they build or hand it over and leave, whether they can name the toolchain they actually operate, and whether reliability is expressed as deployment frequency, lead time, rollback time, and recovery time. Logos and badges answer none of those.
Managed DevOps, often called DevOps as a service, means an external team owns and operates the delivery platform on an ongoing basis, covering pipelines, infrastructure, monitoring, and production support against agreed reliability targets. Consulting is bounded to an assessment, a roadmap, and an implementation phase, after which the internal team takes over, and many engagements combine both.
Delivered engagements include AWS environments automated with Terraform, Ansible, and Docker, and Azure environments using Azure DevOps and Azure Kubernetes Service for release management. Kubernetes, Jenkins, Datadog, PagerDuty, Sumo Logic, Splunk, and Snyk are all in production use across client work, and cloud migration itself is handled by our cloud practice.
Security controls run inside the pipeline rather than as a pre-release gate: dependency and secrets scanning on every build, policy checks on infrastructure changes, and access enforced through code rather than tickets. Compliance scope is defined during the assessment because it changes architecture, and one delivered engagement modernized file-access infrastructure to a fully SOC 2 and FedRAMP certified state.
Cost is driven by how much of the existing pipeline must be rebuilt rather than tuned, the number of environments and cloud accounts in scope, whether compliance applies to the delivery process itself, and whether the engagement ends at handover or continues as a managed model. A firm number and timeline follow the assessment, because until pipelines and environments are mapped, any estimate is a guess.
